Open Access and Peer-reviewed Medical Journal
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal


Letter to the Editor Open Access


The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice

Sevin Ayaz.

Abstract
To the Editor,
It is important to have a thorough knowledge about the conditions or situations which may lead to insufficient fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and false-negative results, particularly in oncological FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) practice. Small tumor or metastatic lymph node dimensions (1, 2), necrotic areas within the tumor, high levels of blood glucose and insulin (3) may be the causes of false-negative FDG-PET/CT findings. In suspicious cases with unexpectedly low FDG affinity, history of corticosteroid treatment with increased doses, radiation therapy and chemotherapy should be questioned (3, 4). Well-differentiated forms of various malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma, some cases of genitourinary tract carcinomas including prostate cancer (3), some cases of ovarian cancer (5), various neuroendocrine tumours and malignancies of the thyroid gland (3), some head and neck squamous cell carcinomas without a known primary (6), some cases of esophageal carcinoma (7), some subtypes/cases of bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (8, 9), some cases of multiple myeloma (10), various metastatic bone tumours (particularly the sclerotic ones) (11), some cases of lobular breast carcinomas, as well as some low-grade malignancies (e.g. some central nervous system tumours and some sarcomas), lymphoma, and malignancies including high amounts of mucin may present with low FDG uptake (3).
In order to overcome this diagnostically challenging situation, it is mandatory to evaluate the plain CT components of FDG-PET/CT images meticulously. But since this may not give sufficient data in some patients, the images which have readily or previously been obtained by other tools such as plain radiography, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, mammography, contrast enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging should be evaluated at the same setting. Also, all the clinical and laboratory findings should be correlated with FDG-PET/CT findings. In indeterminate cases, the diagnosis should be verified by biopsy in appropriate patients.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Export to
Export to
Related Records
 Articles by Sevin Ayaz
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 439
Downloaded: 91
Cited: 0


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Sevin Ayaz. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. Ulutas Med J. 2017; 3(1): 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



Web Style

Sevin Ayaz. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. www.scopemed.org/?mno=258465 [Access: September 25, 2017]. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Sevin Ayaz. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. Ulutas Med J. 2017; 3(1): 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Sevin Ayaz. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. Ulutas Med J. (2017), [cited September 25, 2017]; 3(1): 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



Harvard Style

Sevin Ayaz (2017) The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. Ulutas Med J, 3 (1), 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



Turabian Style

Sevin Ayaz. 2017. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 3 (1), 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



Chicago Style

Sevin Ayaz. "The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 3 (2017), 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Sevin Ayaz. "The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 3.1 (2017), 23-24. Print. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Sevin Ayaz (2017) The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 3 (1), 23-24. doi:10.5455/umj.20170213045950








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


CrossRef

ScopeMed

Google Scholar

TUBITAK Dergipark

Index Scholar

Index Copernicus


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES and STATEMENTS

The articles in Ulutas Medical Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.