E-ISSN 2149-388X | ISSN 2149-0430
 

Original Research (Original Article) 


Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital

Burak Sezgin.

Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to determine our experience on Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with cervical preinvasive lesions in an academic hospital in two years follow-up period.
Materials and Methods: Data from 64 patients with cervical preinvasive lesion who underwent LEEP were analyzed retrospectively. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status, cytological outcomes of patients before LEEP, and after 2 years follow-up period were documented.
Results: Prior to LEEP, 94.52% of patients were positive in terms of HPV status. HPV positivity rate was detected as 13.89% after LEEP. The most common detected HPV type in residual lesions was HPV 16. 67.19% of patients who underwent LEEP have negative cytology after two years follow-up period. The other cytological outcomes at this period were as follows; 21.88% of patients had ASCUS, 9.38% of the patients had LSIL and 1.56 % of patients had HSIL cytology. Surgical margin status was positive in 6.25% of LEEP specimens. There were 3 patients who underwent re-LEEP in two years follow-up period for HSIL.
Conclusion: The LEEP procedure was applied to patients with HSIL and ASC-H with satisfactory recurrence rates in two years follow-up period.

Key words: Leep; HSIL; HPV; LSIL; Cervical cancer; Preinvasive lesion


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Burak Sezgin
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Burak Sezgin. Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. Ulutas Med J. 2020; 6(3): 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656


Web Style

Burak Sezgin. Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. http://www.ulutasmedicaljournal.com/?mno=118487 [Access: October 23, 2020]. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Burak Sezgin. Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. Ulutas Med J. 2020; 6(3): 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Burak Sezgin. Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. Ulutas Med J. (2020), [cited October 23, 2020]; 6(3): 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



Harvard Style

Burak Sezgin (2020) Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. Ulutas Med J, 6 (3), 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



Turabian Style

Burak Sezgin. 2020. Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 6 (3), 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



Chicago Style

Burak Sezgin. "Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 6 (2020), 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Burak Sezgin. "Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 6.3 (2020), 156-161. Print. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Burak Sezgin (2020) Outcomes of Two Years Follow-Up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in a University Hospital. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 6 (3), 156-161. doi:10.5455/umj.20200624063656