E-ISSN 2149-388X | ISSN 2149-0430
 

Original Article 


Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Kazim Dogan.

Abstract
Introduction: The study evaluates the outcomes of different surgical techniques, including Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT), Trans-Obturator Tape (TOT), Burch Colpopexy (BC), and Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair (APR), in treating primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care center, comprising 62 women diagnosed with primary SUI who underwent one of the aforementioned surgical procedures. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed, including age, BMI, menopausal status, reproductive history, incontinence types, anticholinergic use, and preoperative assessments.
Results: No differences were found in age (p=0.227), weight (p=0.943), height (p=0.333), and BMI (p=0.642) among the four treatment groups. The distribution of menopausal patients and reproductive history variables did not differ among the groups. Postoperative anticholinergic prescription rates (p=0.769) and duration of use (p=0.531) were not different across the groups. The majority of patients in the TVT, TOT, and BC groups had a grade 2 cystocele (p=0.065). The BC group had 100% grade 1 rectocele, which was not significant compared to other groups (p=0.126).
Conclusion: Our results showed no potential difference in comparable outcomes among TVT, TOT, BC, and APR for the surgical treatment of primary SUI.

Key words: Stress urinary incontinence, tension-free vaginal tape, trans-obturator tape, burch colpopexy, anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Kazim Dogan
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Kazim Dogan. Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ulutas Med J. 2023; 9(3): 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835


Web Style

Kazim Dogan. Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. https://www.ulutasmedicaljournal.com/?mno=166235 [Access: December 05, 2023]. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Kazim Dogan. Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ulutas Med J. 2023; 9(3): 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Kazim Dogan. Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ulutas Med J. (2023), [cited December 05, 2023]; 9(3): 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



Harvard Style

Kazim Dogan (2023) Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ulutas Med J, 9 (3), 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



Turabian Style

Kazim Dogan. 2023. Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 9 (3), 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



Chicago Style

Kazim Dogan. "Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 9 (2023), 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Kazim Dogan. "Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 9.3 (2023), 152-157. Print. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Kazim Dogan (2023) Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 9 (3), 152-157. doi:10.5455/umj.20230821091835